Mason Jar Breakfast

Not Your Grandma's Mason Jar Anymore!

  • Home
  • Recipes
    • Mason Jar Breakfast
    • Mason Jar Lunch
    • Mason Jar Dinner
    • Mason Jar Dessert
  • Crafts
  • Décor
  • Gifts
  • Beauty
  • About
  • Shop
  • Others
    • Auto
    • Business
    • Fashion
    • Food & Beverage
    • Health
    • Home Improvement
    • Immigration & Investment
    • Lifestyle
    • SEO Digital
    • Tech
    • Travel
Shopping for an engagement ring together: Tips for couples

Shopping for an engagement ring together: Tips for couples

Relationships Leave a comment

Shopping for an engagement ring together: Tips for couplesRemember when shopping for an engagement ring was a solo mission filled with nerves and guesswork? Today, more couples are opting to shop together, transforming a stressful task into something collaborative, romantic, and genuinely fun. If you’re ready to find the perfect ring together, here’s some practical guidance on how to make the shopping process seamless and memorable for you both.

Set a budget before you shop

Before you begin browsing, you must set a realistic budget. If you know exactly what you can spend, it’ll help narrow down the many choices and also prevent financial strain. Yes, the ‘three months of salary’ guideline still floats around, but it’s more important that you and your partner agree on what feels comfortable. If you’re unsure about how much a ring should cost, consult with friends and family who have gone through the process.

Find the perfect ring

It’s important to talk openly about what the person wearing the ring prefers – not just style, but the type of gemstone, the cuts, and the metals used for the setting. Timeless classics like a solitaire are always popular, but you can’t go wrong with modern designs like a halo engagement ring, which offers brilliance and a touch of vintage flair. You could also opt for something different that celebrates both of you, such as a ‘toi et moi’ (you and me) ring that features two stones side by side.

Consider fit, quality, and insurance

Try on a variety of rings – even ones that you didn’t initially consider. You may end up being surprised by what feels right: that simple, classic ring might suit you better than a quirkier option. Check sizing carefully since it can be difficult to adjust later on.

Also, see this as an opportunity to learn about what makes a quality gemstone or diamond. Research the 4 Cs of diamond quality: cut, color, clarity, and carat, and assess your ring options against these criteria. For example, does the ring’s brilliance and sparkle match the high price tag?

Finally, for peace of mind, look into engagement ring insurance early on.

Let your ring reflect your journey

Shopping for an engagement ring as a couple turns the tradition into a shared celebration of your love and your future together. With open, honest conversations and a little research into styles and symbolism, you can find a ring that truly reflects your story.

Related Posts

  • 7 Tips for Shopping Maternity Clothes Online with Ease

    Shopping for maternity clothes online can be a convenient and fun experience if you know…

  • Taxation Tips for Australian Small Businesses

    The taxation requirements for small businesses in Australia vary depending on the structure of your…

  • How to Do Tile Shopping Effectively

    Tile shopping can be an overwhelming experience with so many styles, colors, and materials to…

  • TIPS FOR USING SPRING FRAGRANCE FOR MEN
    TIPS FOR USING SPRING FRAGRANCE FOR MEN

    The spring season offers an excellent opportunity to update your fragrance selection. The weather transition…

Filed Under: Relationships

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hi, I'm Yetta. I love having dance parties in the kitchen with my family, traveling, and Mason jar creations.

Follow on Facebook Follow on Pinterest Follow on Twitter Follow on Instagram

Recent Posts

Starting Your Professional Life in a New Country: The First 90 Days
Must-Try Culinary Experiences on a Spain and Portugal Tour
"This risk adjustment software will transform your operations," the sales rep promised. Eight months later, our coders were using Excel spreadsheets to track what the $400,000 system couldn't handle. The software worked perfectly, if your workflow matched their demo, your data was pristine, and your coders thought like programmers. None of those things were true. So we had a very expensive system that technically functioned but practically failed. The Workflow Mismatch The software assumed everyone codes the same way. Chart in, review it, code it, submit. Linear. Clean. Nothing like reality. Sarah likes to review all medications first, then look at notes. Kevin starts with most recent encounters and works backwards. Linda groups similar conditions and codes them in batches. The software forced everyone into the same rigid workflow. Productivity crashed 40%. We couldn't assign charts based on coder strengths anymore. The system distributed work "intelligently" using an algorithm nobody understood. Our cardiac specialist coder got pediatric charts. Our mental health expert got orthopedic cases. The AI was intelligent like a particularly dense brick. Simple tasks became complex ordeals. Reassigning a chart? Seven clicks through three menus. Adding a note? Navigate to a different module. Checking previous coding? Log into the audit portal. We spent more time navigating than coding. The Black Box Problem When the software suggested an HCC, we had no idea why. It just appeared: "Consider E11.42." Based on what? Which documentation? What logic? The vendor called it "proprietary AI." We called it guessing. Auditors don't accept "the AI said so" as supporting documentation. We need to know exactly where diagnoses come from. But the software wouldn't show its work. It was like having a coder who refuses to explain their decisions. Expensive and useless. The risk scores it calculated were consistently wrong. Not wildly wrong, just wrong enough to matter. Off by 3-7% every time. For a 10,000-member population, that's millions in misestimated revenue. When we asked why, they said the algorithm was "complex." Complex doesn't mean correct. The Integration Nightmare "Seamless integration" turned into six months of consultants trying to make our seven systems talk to one black box that spoke its own language. Patient IDs didn't match. Date formats conflicted. Diagnosis codes came through corrupted. We spent $75,000 on integration fixes for a system that was supposed to integrate seamlessly. The real killer? Updates. Every time any connected system updated, something broke. EHR upgrade? Risk adjustment software stops pulling charts. Claims system patch? Risk scores disappear. We spent more time fixing connections than using the actual software. The Report Nobody Wanted The software generated 47 different reports. Beautiful, colorful, completely useless reports. We needed to know three things: What needs coding? What got coded? What are we missing? Instead, we got "Hierarchical Condition Category Velocity Trending Analysis" and "Prospective Risk Stratification Heat Maps." I still don't know what those mean. Creating a simple list of completed charts required exporting three reports, combining them in Excel, and manually filtering. The "one-click reporting" they promised required approximately 47 clicks and a prayer. My favorite feature was the executive dashboard that showed real-time coding productivity. Except it wasn't real-time (24-hour delay), and the productivity metrics measured things nobody cared about. Executives wanted revenue impact. They got colorful circles showing "coding velocity vectors." The Excel Solution After eight months of suffering, Jenny from IT built us a replacement in Excel and Access. Took her three weeks. Cost nothing but overtime pizza. It's ugly. It's basic. It does exactly what we need and nothing else. Charts come in, get assigned based on simple rules, coders review them, codes get tracked. No AI. No algorithms. No intelligence. Just functional simplicity. Betty can explain exactly how it calculates risk scores because she can see the formulas. When something breaks, Jenny fixes it in an hour, not three weeks of vendor support tickets. When we need a new report, we build it ourselves. The homemade system is 200% faster than the expensive software. Not because it's sophisticated, but because it matches how we actually work instead of forcing us to match how it works. Your Software Reality Check Time how long it takes to code one chart in your risk adjustment software, including every click, screen load, and system navigation. Now time the same task in Excel. If Excel is faster, you've got a problem. Ask three coders to explain how your software calculates risk scores. If you get three different answers (or three confused looks), you're trusting math nobody understands. Count how many workarounds your team has created. External spreadsheets? Manual tracking documents? Post-it note systems? Each workaround proves the software doesn't actually work for real humans doing real work. The best risk adjustment software isn't the smartest or most features-rich. It's the one that gets out of the way and lets coders code. Everything else is expensive friction that makes simple tasks complex and complex tasks impossible.
What’s the Secret to Building Happier Communities?
Beyond iTunes: 10 Surprising Things You Can Buy With an Apple Gift Card
From Dollhouse Dreams to Real Kitchen Scenes

Recent Posts

  • Starting Your Professional Life in a New Country: The First 90 Days
  • Must-Try Culinary Experiences on a Spain and Portugal Tour
  • The Risk Adjustment Software That Actually Made Our Jobs Harder
  • What’s the Secret to Building Happier Communities?
  • Beyond iTunes: 10 Surprising Things You Can Buy With an Apple Gift Card

categories

Copyright © 2025 · All rights reserved. Disclosure Policy. Contact Us: Kelli@masonjarbreakfast.com