Mason Jar Breakfast

Not Your Grandma's Mason Jar Anymore!

  • Home
  • Recipes
    • Mason Jar Breakfast
    • Mason Jar Lunch
    • Mason Jar Dinner
    • Mason Jar Dessert
  • Crafts
  • Décor
  • Gifts
  • Beauty
  • About
  • Shop
  • Others
    • Auto
    • Business
    • Fashion
    • Food & Beverage
    • Health
    • Home Improvement
    • Immigration & Investment
    • Lifestyle
    • SEO Digital
    • Tech
    • Travel
Rosalind-Ingledew’s

Rosalind Ingledew’s early life, education, and successful career

Entertainment Leave a comment

Rosalind Ingledew’s early life and education

Rosalind Ingledew was born on 23 September 1957 in New Zealand. She studied acting there, before moving to the United States. We do not have any information about her early life and education. She loved to live a private life. She is inactive on social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter.

Rosalind Ingledew is best known for her portrayal of Doctor Wendy Smith in the second season of Sea Quest DSV. Here we will discuss her successful career in the film industry.

Rosalind Ingledew’s successful career

Rosalind Ingledew began her career in the entertainment industry with small but meaningful roles. Her first appearance on the big screen came as an extra in the 1990 comedy film Three Men and a Little Lady.

This early experience gave her a glimpse into the world of filmmaking and served as a stepping stone toward larger opportunities. Ingledew’s career began to gain momentum as she made guest appearances in various daytime dramas throughout the mid-1980s.

These roles, though minor, allowed her to hone her craft and establish herself as a versatile performer. One of her more significant early roles came in the 1992 horror sequel Children of the Corn II: The Final Sacrifice, where she played a supporting character.

Rosalind-Ingledew’s--1

The film, part of a popular franchise, gave Ingledew the chance to showcase her acting skills to a broader audience. Her performance caught the attention of casting directors, opening doors to more prominent projects. Ingledew’s breakthrough came when she was cast as Doctor Wendy Smith in the second season of NBC’s science fiction series seaQuest DSV.

The show, set shortly, focuses on the adventures of a high-tech submarine crew exploring the mysteries of the ocean. Ingledew’s portrayal of Dr. Smith, a skilled and intelligent scientist, earned her recognition among fans of the genre. Her time on the series, though brief, left a lasting impression. Notably, she appeared in the episode “The Siamese Dream” alongside her then-husband, actor Todd Allen. Despite leaving the show after one season, her work on seaQuest DSV remains a highlight of her career.

In addition to her role on seaQuest DSV, Ingledew made a memorable guest appearance on Star Trek: The Next Generation. Her performance on the iconic series further solidified her reputation as a talented actress capable of taking on diverse roles. Fans of 1980s and 1990s television may also recognize Ingledew from her appearances on the long-running soap opera Dallas. She twice played Bobby Ewing’s love interest, albeit as two different characters, in the show’s original run and its subsequent reunion TV movie Della: J.R. Returns.

These roles demonstrated her ability to adapt to different characters and storylines, a skill that contributed to her enduring appeal. Despite her relatively limited filmography, Ingledew’s contributions to the entertainment industry have left an indelible mark. Her decision to prioritize privacy over fame has allowed her to focus on her craft and maintain a sense of balance in her life.

 

Related Posts

  • Kristen-Sawatzky’s
    Kristen Sawatzky’s early life, education, and her successful career

    Kristen Sawatzky’s early life and education Kristen Sawatzky is a stunt performer. She performed stunts…

  • Elliot-Handler’s
    Elliot Handler’s early life, education, personal life, and business

    Elliot Handler was born on 9 April 1916 in Chicago. He was an American inventor,…

  • Regina-Peruggi’s
    Regina Peruggi’s Early Life and Education, Professional Journey, Advocacy for Accessible Education, and Personal Life

    Distinguished educator and academic leader, Regina Peruggi is well-known for her pioneering contributions in education…

  • Radha-Delamarter
    Radha Delamarter Early Life, Career, and Spouse

    Radha Delamarter is a well- accomplished lady famed for her part played in the advancement…

Filed Under: Entertainment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hi, I'm Yetta. I love having dance parties in the kitchen with my family, traveling, and Mason jar creations.

Follow on Facebook Follow on Pinterest Follow on Twitter Follow on Instagram

Recent Posts

How to Find the Right Heating Contractor for Your Project
The-Importance-of-Sleep-in-Addiction-Recovery
Starting Your Professional Life in a New Country: The First 90 Days
Must-Try Culinary Experiences on a Spain and Portugal Tour
"This risk adjustment software will transform your operations," the sales rep promised. Eight months later, our coders were using Excel spreadsheets to track what the $400,000 system couldn't handle. The software worked perfectly, if your workflow matched their demo, your data was pristine, and your coders thought like programmers. None of those things were true. So we had a very expensive system that technically functioned but practically failed. The Workflow Mismatch The software assumed everyone codes the same way. Chart in, review it, code it, submit. Linear. Clean. Nothing like reality. Sarah likes to review all medications first, then look at notes. Kevin starts with most recent encounters and works backwards. Linda groups similar conditions and codes them in batches. The software forced everyone into the same rigid workflow. Productivity crashed 40%. We couldn't assign charts based on coder strengths anymore. The system distributed work "intelligently" using an algorithm nobody understood. Our cardiac specialist coder got pediatric charts. Our mental health expert got orthopedic cases. The AI was intelligent like a particularly dense brick. Simple tasks became complex ordeals. Reassigning a chart? Seven clicks through three menus. Adding a note? Navigate to a different module. Checking previous coding? Log into the audit portal. We spent more time navigating than coding. The Black Box Problem When the software suggested an HCC, we had no idea why. It just appeared: "Consider E11.42." Based on what? Which documentation? What logic? The vendor called it "proprietary AI." We called it guessing. Auditors don't accept "the AI said so" as supporting documentation. We need to know exactly where diagnoses come from. But the software wouldn't show its work. It was like having a coder who refuses to explain their decisions. Expensive and useless. The risk scores it calculated were consistently wrong. Not wildly wrong, just wrong enough to matter. Off by 3-7% every time. For a 10,000-member population, that's millions in misestimated revenue. When we asked why, they said the algorithm was "complex." Complex doesn't mean correct. The Integration Nightmare "Seamless integration" turned into six months of consultants trying to make our seven systems talk to one black box that spoke its own language. Patient IDs didn't match. Date formats conflicted. Diagnosis codes came through corrupted. We spent $75,000 on integration fixes for a system that was supposed to integrate seamlessly. The real killer? Updates. Every time any connected system updated, something broke. EHR upgrade? Risk adjustment software stops pulling charts. Claims system patch? Risk scores disappear. We spent more time fixing connections than using the actual software. The Report Nobody Wanted The software generated 47 different reports. Beautiful, colorful, completely useless reports. We needed to know three things: What needs coding? What got coded? What are we missing? Instead, we got "Hierarchical Condition Category Velocity Trending Analysis" and "Prospective Risk Stratification Heat Maps." I still don't know what those mean. Creating a simple list of completed charts required exporting three reports, combining them in Excel, and manually filtering. The "one-click reporting" they promised required approximately 47 clicks and a prayer. My favorite feature was the executive dashboard that showed real-time coding productivity. Except it wasn't real-time (24-hour delay), and the productivity metrics measured things nobody cared about. Executives wanted revenue impact. They got colorful circles showing "coding velocity vectors." The Excel Solution After eight months of suffering, Jenny from IT built us a replacement in Excel and Access. Took her three weeks. Cost nothing but overtime pizza. It's ugly. It's basic. It does exactly what we need and nothing else. Charts come in, get assigned based on simple rules, coders review them, codes get tracked. No AI. No algorithms. No intelligence. Just functional simplicity. Betty can explain exactly how it calculates risk scores because she can see the formulas. When something breaks, Jenny fixes it in an hour, not three weeks of vendor support tickets. When we need a new report, we build it ourselves. The homemade system is 200% faster than the expensive software. Not because it's sophisticated, but because it matches how we actually work instead of forcing us to match how it works. Your Software Reality Check Time how long it takes to code one chart in your risk adjustment software, including every click, screen load, and system navigation. Now time the same task in Excel. If Excel is faster, you've got a problem. Ask three coders to explain how your software calculates risk scores. If you get three different answers (or three confused looks), you're trusting math nobody understands. Count how many workarounds your team has created. External spreadsheets? Manual tracking documents? Post-it note systems? Each workaround proves the software doesn't actually work for real humans doing real work. The best risk adjustment software isn't the smartest or most features-rich. It's the one that gets out of the way and lets coders code. Everything else is expensive friction that makes simple tasks complex and complex tasks impossible.
What’s the Secret to Building Happier Communities?

Recent Posts

  • How to Find the Right Heating Contractor for Your Project
  • The Importance of Sleep in Addiction Recovery
  • Starting Your Professional Life in a New Country: The First 90 Days
  • Must-Try Culinary Experiences on a Spain and Portugal Tour
  • The Risk Adjustment Software That Actually Made Our Jobs Harder

categories

Copyright © 2025 · All rights reserved. Disclosure Policy. Contact Us: Kelli@masonjarbreakfast.com